首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of pollen extraction methods: confirmation of dense-media separation as a reliable method of pollen preparation
【2h】

A comparison of pollen extraction methods: confirmation of dense-media separation as a reliable method of pollen preparation

机译:花粉提取方法的比较:确认密集培养基分离作为花粉制备的可靠方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Palynology is a crucial proxy for understanding Quaternary environmental change. A range of laboratory preparation techniques has been developed to deal with the extraction of pollen in different sedimentary contexts. Here, we present a comparison of the conventional hydrofluoric acid method and the dense-media separation method using sodium polytungstate. We examine pollen, non-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs) and microcharcoal by undertaking parallel preparation and counting of 30 paired samples from three sites in the Middle Atlas Mountains, Morocco, with contrasting environmental and sedimentary conditions. Differences between microfossil counts are assessed visually and statistically, using ANOVA and linear regression. We observe that the typical offset between counts for the five most common pollen and NPPs produced by the two methods (µ = 1.6%, SD = 0.9%) is considerably smaller than the 95% uncertainty associated with the standard counting procedure (µ = 6.8%, SD = 2.7%). There is no statistically significant difference associated with the preparation methods, and no significant deviation from a linear relationship between the results obtained by the two methods. There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods in terms of preparation time and visual characteristics. This study confirms that results for pollen, NPPs and microcharcoal obtained by either preparation method can be directly compared.
机译:孢粉学是理解第四纪环境变化的重要代理。已经开发了一系列实验室制备技术来处理不同沉积环境中花粉的提取。在这里,我们比较传统的氢氟酸法和使用聚钨酸钠的重介质分离法。我们通过平行制备和对摩洛哥中部阿特拉斯山脉三个地点的30个成对样品进行计数,并对比环境和沉积条件,来研究花粉,非花粉类植物(NPPs)和微木炭。使用ANOVA和线性回归,通过视觉和统计方法评估微化石计数之间的差异。我们观察到,两种方法产生的五个最常见花粉和NPP的计数之间的典型偏移量(µ = 1.6%,SD = 0.9%)大大小于与标准计数程序相关的95%不确定度(µ = 6.8) %,SD = 2.7%)。制备方法之间没有统计学上的显着差异,并且两种方法获得的结果之间的线性关系也没有显着偏差。就制备时间和视觉特性而言,这两种方法都有优缺点。这项研究证实,可以直接比较通过两种制备方法获得的花粉,NPP和微炭的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号